DannyStewart.com Forums

DannyStewart.com Forums (https://forums.dannystewart.com/index.php)
-   Introductions and Forum Help (https://forums.dannystewart.com/forumdisplay.php?f=113)
-   -   Hello everyone! (https://forums.dannystewart.com/showthread.php?t=8206)

Danny Stewart February 24, 2007 2:19 PM

The dictionary would disagree with you, Ronn.

1. true; not merely ostensible, nominal, or apparent: the real reason for an act.
2. existing or occurring as fact; actual rather than imaginary, ideal, or fictitious: a story taken from real life.
3. being an actual thing; having objective existence; not imaginary: The events you will see in the film are real and not just made up.
4. being actually such; not merely so-called: a real victory.
5. genuine; not counterfeit, artificial, or imitation; authentic: a real antique; a real diamond; real silk.
6. unfeigned or sincere: real sympathy; a real friend.
7. Informal. absolute; complete; utter: She's a real brain.
8. Philosophy.
a. existent or pertaining to the existent as opposed to the nonexistent.
b. actual as opposed to possible or potential.
c. independent of experience as opposed to phenomenal or apparent.
9. (of money, income, or the like) measured in purchasing power rather than in nominal value: Inflation has driven income down in real terms, though nominal income appears to be higher.
10. Optics. (of an image) formed by the actual convergence of rays, as the image produced in a camera (opposed to virtual).
11. Mathematics.
a. of, pertaining to, or having the value of a real number.
b. using real numbers: real analysis; real vector space.
–adverb
12. Informal. very or extremely: You did a real nice job painting the house.
–noun
13. real number.
14. the real,
a. something that actually exists, as a particular quantity.
b. reality in general.
—Idiom
15. for real, Informal.
a. in reality; actually: You mean she dyed her hair green for real?
b. real; actual: The company's plans to relocate are for real.
c. genuine; sincere: I don't believe his friendly attitude is for real.

Ronnie Rowlands February 24, 2007 2:26 PM

It doesn't list the way that Jez and Katja were referring to. And anyway, you live in the US, things are different over here:P

robertbeare February 24, 2007 4:35 PM

CE, and REAL
 
I also thought that it was a shame they got rid of Christopher Eccleston to fast and i understood that katja's real meant she thought that he was better than all doctors (maybe not so true)

Danny Stewart February 24, 2007 4:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31552)
It doesn't list the way that Jez and Katja were referring to. And anyway, you live in the US, things are different over here:P

Words are still words. :P

Recurring Villain February 24, 2007 8:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31552)
It doesn't list the way that Jez and Katja were referring to. And anyway, you live in the US, things are different over here:P

I live in Australia and we use words dynamically as well.

Is there a tiny, tiny section of your great country where people only accept 'real' as 'the opposite of fake'?

Because the rest of the world doesn't.

Ronnie Rowlands February 25, 2007 5:48 AM

Nope, just me.:P

Sam Davies February 26, 2007 9:27 AM

Rob I disagree with you. I've said it once and i'll say it again David Tenant is better than Christopher Eccleston.

Danny Stewart February 26, 2007 2:33 PM

David Tennant is a lot better than Christopher Eccleston.

Smartin February 26, 2007 3:27 PM

Quote:

I also thought that it was a shame they got rid of Christopher Eccleston to fast and i understood that katja's real meant she thought that he was better than all doctors (maybe not so true)
I thought Christopher Eccleston quit?

I agree, David Tennant is much better

Ben Dawson February 26, 2007 4:01 PM

yeah, he did...for undisclosed reasons wink wink ;)

Ronnie Rowlands February 26, 2007 5:38 PM

I'm sure most of the older members know, but I really don't like David Tennant at all. Just looking at him fills me up with anger.

Danny Stewart February 26, 2007 6:31 PM

Ronn is a strange person.

Ronnie Rowlands February 27, 2007 3:05 AM

Well just look at him. All smiley like that grinning dizzy looking Doctor Tom Baker, and having the 'vunerability' of Davison, and the 'wisdom' of Hartnell, that's what the people say, that he's got a bit of all the old Doctors in him. I'm sorry, but I don't want to see all the old Doctors, I want to see a *new* character, not a medley of all the old ones. There are 100 other reasons I could post but I don't want to. I've said them all at one time or another :P

Recurring Villain February 27, 2007 3:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31683)
Just looking at him fills me up with anger.

Yeah well. Just looking at your anger fills Doctor Who with David Tennant.

Ronnie Rowlands February 27, 2007 3:26 AM

...Does that make any sense?:P

Danny Stewart February 27, 2007 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31708)
I don't want to see all the old Doctors, I want to see a *new* character, not a medley of all the old ones.

That's not what Doctor Who, or for that matter, regeneration, is all about. Essentially you're saying you don't like the character of the Doctor, and you'd rather see a different character lead the show.

Ronnie Rowlands February 27, 2007 1:21 PM

Well, it worked with the first few Doctors didn't it? They were all different weren't they?...

Danny Stewart February 27, 2007 5:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31780)
Well, it worked with the first few Doctors didn't it? They were all different weren't they?...

Not at all. Regeneration was never ever supposed to give us a different character. That's not the point of it!

Ronnie Rowlands February 27, 2007 5:37 PM

Yes, I know it's the same person, but personality wise, they contrasted. The 1st and 2nd Doctors were completely different in personality weren't they? As were the rest of the early doctors.

Danny Stewart February 27, 2007 7:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 31804)
Yes, I know it's the same person, but personality wise, they contrasted. The 1st and 2nd Doctors were completely different in personality weren't they? As were the rest of the early doctors.

The personalities that emerge each time are completely random. It's only logical that after a while they begin to overlap somewhat.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2001 - 2020, Danny Stewart