DannyStewart.com Forums

DannyStewart.com Forums (https://forums.dannystewart.com/index.php)
-   News and Updates (https://forums.dannystewart.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   Petition against new BBC credit sequence rules (https://forums.dannystewart.com/showthread.php?t=8442)

Marinedalek May 4, 2007 7:32 PM

Petition against new BBC credit sequence rules
 
The BBC have released their new rules regarding programme credit sequences. You can see the results for yourself here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/c...position.shtml

I urge you to sign this petition against these ridiculous rules to preserve our right to sensible un-squished credits with 15 other things going on trying to grab our attention.

Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/bbccspt/petition.html

Danny Stewart May 4, 2007 7:33 PM

A very disturbing development -- thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have signed the petition and I hope the rest of the site members will follow suit.

Recurring Villain May 4, 2007 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 35135)
A very disturbing development.

Are the credits really that important to you?

Ronnie Rowlands May 5, 2007 2:22 AM

I heard about this on TVF. I hope this never happens. I'm already pissed off that announcers talk over all the closing music, I'll sign.

Danny Stewart May 5, 2007 2:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Recurring Villain (Post 35138)
Are the credits really that important to you?

Absolutely. It's always been a pet peeve of mine when networks screw with credits. Creative control of a show's credits should be left up to the people who make the show, not mandated by restrictions of the network. I find this whole thing ridiculous and outrageous.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 35139)
I hope this never happens.

Sorry, Ronn, but it already is happening, effective 1 June. This is already going into effect. Our only hope is to try and reverse it which is why we need people to sign the petition. Thanks for your signature.

EDIT: I encourage people to actually take note of the ridiculous restrictions they're imposing. Essentially, every credit sequence from now on will be squashed to one-fifth of the screen so that BBC advertisements and show schedules can use the remaining space. Additionally, credit sequences can't be longer than 30 seconds, and the styling of the credits themselves will be strictly controlled. I'm very disappointed about all of this!

Recurring Villain May 5, 2007 2:45 AM

The world is ending ;___;

Danny Stewart May 5, 2007 2:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Recurring Villain (Post 35141)
The world is ending ;___;

Go away, RV. It might not matter to you but it's significant enough to me.

Recurring Villain May 5, 2007 4:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 35142)
Go away, RV. It might not matter to you but it's significant enough to me.

The last time I went away you begged me to come back. No pleasing some people :P

Dalek104 May 5, 2007 8:25 AM

I've signed. ;)

Ben Dawson May 5, 2007 10:24 AM

I've signed, I urge anybody else who hasn't to do so...just remember, if this happens to Doctor Who, it will mean a condensed version of the closing theme.

Superkid11 May 5, 2007 2:29 PM

*signs* You shouldn't have to tolerate that if you pay a liscence fee. We're already doing that here in US of Ads and it's pretty dumb. Even when we get digital cable...

Mine was #68... awh, just one away from 69...

Ronnie Rowlands May 5, 2007 2:32 PM

Yes. I posted the link to the petition to TV Forum. There's loads of members there, and as it's a TV presentation site, I'm pretty sure we'll get a lot of "signatures"

Recurring Villain May 5, 2007 10:53 PM

In Australia cable TV has more ads than the commercial networks.

Nobody watches cable :D

Ross Hendrie May 7, 2007 3:47 PM

This seems to have caused quite a stir with you guys. What's wrong with the opening titles?

MI7 May 7, 2007 4:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 35265)
This seems to have caused quite a stir with you guys. What's wrong with the opening titles?

Uh, they don't have credits on them? :P

Sontaran Of Brunei May 8, 2007 12:54 PM

I've signed it. The whole affair is a complete disgrace - how dare the BBC try to demoot the credits of their flagship show.

Besides, we want to keep the middle eight! The closing credits sequence is as much part of the show as the TARDIS or The Doctor is.

Ross Hendrie May 8, 2007 1:26 PM

I can understand why they want to cut down the end titles, it makes for less arsing about between shows as they dont have to do all the 'still to come' stuff between them. Unfortunately, the Doctor Who credits are somewhat more dear to the hardcore fans than on other shows.

Danny Stewart May 8, 2007 1:53 PM

I disagree. Have you read Pete's petition? He makes many excellent points.

scrotnig May 8, 2007 3:32 PM

Remember though they are only guidelines. I'm sure some shows will be allowed some leeway, perhaps Doctor Who will be one of them.

Danny Stewart May 8, 2007 5:01 PM

They call them guidelines, but look at them closely. They clearly say "acceptable" and "unacceptable," and even if Doctor Who is allowed leeway, I still am very much against the principle in the first place.

MI7 May 8, 2007 5:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scrotnig (Post 35314)
Remember though they are only guidelines. I'm sure some shows will be allowed some leeway, perhaps Doctor Who will be one of them.

Not guidelines. Rules. They say "guidelines" but really they mean "you gotta do this or we'll mess with your head even more".

Point A: On the BBC WALES SPECIFIC guidelines (bear in mind Doctor Who is produced by BBC Wales) it even has this helpful reminder:

Quote:

Companies not following these instructions will have their programmes rejected and will have to make corrections at their own expense.
See that? If you don't follow, you'll get rejected. Simple as. Granted, the BBC Wales guidelines are for BBC Wales transmission not BBC Wales production ("not network commissions") though to be honest I can't see why BBC Wales would reject your work and the normal BBC pass it. If anything I would expect it to be the other way round.

And it also states at the top of the normal BBC article:

Quote:

All pre-recorded network programmes for BBC One, Two, Three, and Four delivered on or after Friday 1st June 2007 should conform to the new guidelines.
ALL. All of them. No programmes will be let off the hook, Doctor Who included. Eastenders is often a bigger audience puller than Doctor Who, and it isn't being let off, so why should Doctor Who? Hell, Eastenders is even used as the template for the credit guidelines.

Sam Davies May 9, 2007 4:16 AM

Does nobody think this is a good idea.

Ronnie Rowlands May 9, 2007 4:22 AM

No Sam. Absolutely no way. The idea sucks.

Sam Davies May 9, 2007 4:24 AM

O.k but why.

Ronnie Rowlands May 9, 2007 4:29 AM

Why don't you read over the entire thread?

Sam Davies May 9, 2007 4:31 AM

I have but obviously my views are different from everyone elses. I 'll just stay out of this thread before I anger someone.

Danny Stewart May 9, 2007 9:47 AM

Sam -- why would you want the credits of shows to be butchered? It screws up the theme, you can't pay respect to the people who work so hard to bring you the show, and it limits what creative things you can do with credit sequences!

Danny Stewart May 9, 2007 1:51 PM

Thank you, Daryl!

robertbeare May 9, 2007 2:41 PM

i have signed as the mini-mizing of the credits frustrates me at times , as on the doctor who "Shakespearean Code" i was looking for one of the actors names and just as it came up the credits shrunk, i think that keeping the credits large and easily readable and not shrunk to suit the broadcasters is a worthy cause.

Sam Davies May 10, 2007 7:44 AM

Fine I signed. I just think that saying that it's disturbing is a bit of an exaggeration.

Danny Stewart May 10, 2007 10:26 AM

It bothers me very much. It may not bother you as much as it bothers me, but you have to at least recognize that it's worse than what you have now!

Jammy Jason May 10, 2007 1:53 PM

If it helps ill sign, make the world a better place.

Hamster May 11, 2007 3:46 AM

I've signed too. The main thing that concerns me about these new rules is the point that the names of the people involved in putting the show together will now be much more difficult to read. All well and good if everyone already knows exactly who the people in question are, but the crew and actors in supporting roles surely deserve as much recognition for their work. There are obviously other problems with these rules, but at the moment that's the one that is my main problem with them.

Sam Davies May 11, 2007 5:12 AM

I think I understand it a bit better now. I do however think it looks cool.

roseNmartha May 12, 2007 2:56 PM

They should leave it how it is. Anyway I've signed.

Who? May 13, 2007 6:24 AM

Ive Signed as well!

Ronnie Rowlands May 13, 2007 6:25 AM

HOw many signatures are we up to?

MI7 May 13, 2007 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands (Post 35788)
HOw many signatures are we up to?

261, apparently. A respectable amount but I still don't think it will make the BBC change their minds. You'd need thousands to do that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2001 - 2020, Danny Stewart