DannyStewart.com Forums

DannyStewart.com Forums (https://forums.dannystewart.com/index.php)
-   Entertainment World (https://forums.dannystewart.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Star Trek (https://forums.dannystewart.com/showthread.php?t=9544)

Danny Stewart May 10, 2009 11:50 PM

Star Trek
 
So... new Star Trek movie.

It was pretty awesome.

Mister_Wilbur May 12, 2009 5:52 PM

T'was a shiny movie! 5 out of 5.

Jamie Minty May 13, 2009 12:51 PM

Good actors, good director, good story! Look forward to more. The spock story was good. Sylar makes a great Spock!

Recurring Villain May 14, 2009 5:19 AM

JJ Abrams: What do the kids like these days?

Intern: Gee, I don't know, let me check the internet.

* 5 Minutes Later *

Intern: Well, I've checked the internet.

JJ: And?

Intern: I've ascertained that the kids are into lense flares.

JJ: Lense flares?

Intern: According to the internet, lense flares are all the rage.

JJ: Excellent, get me a copy of photoshop. This is going to be the best movie ever.

Danny Stewart May 14, 2009 1:41 PM

He admits he overdid it with the lens flares. It was a bit much in places but overall not as bad as I feared. And it was a good movie.

Ross Hendrie May 18, 2009 7:23 AM

Started brilliantly, however the whole alternate future thing got a bit weird. Overall though, it was a step in the right direction to reviving Star Trek.

Danny Stewart May 19, 2009 2:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53640)
Started brilliantly, however the whole alternate future thing got a bit weird.

It made pretty much perfect sense. You're lucky we got a writing team who bothered to explain the changes at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53640)
Overall though, it was a step in the right direction to reviving Star Trek.

Um, it wasn't a step, it was the revival of Star Trek. :P

Ross Hendrie May 19, 2009 2:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 53642)
It made pretty much perfect sense. You're lucky we got a writing team who bothered to explain the changes at all.

I'm not saying it was poorly explained, I'm just saying it was weird that they decided to destroy Vulcan.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 53642)
Um, it wasn't a step, it was the revival of Star Trek.

Yes.

Danny Stewart May 20, 2009 1:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53643)
I'm not saying it was poorly explained, I'm just saying it was weird that they decided to destroy Vulcan.

It didn't sound like that's what you were trying to say. :P

Though I agree. That was a bold move.

Chris Britton May 21, 2009 4:41 PM

Great film, great acting, great pacing and a wonderful storyline, pretty much the best thing we have seen from Star Trek since they did First Contact, and DS9 ;)

That said destroying Vulcan took a lot of balls, and they pulled it off and was a delight to see Nemoy back for a final hurrah too.

Also happy with the alternative universe idea, thankfully 40 years of cannon has not been erased and now the actors are not bound by all that cannon to restrict their roles, which was what made Watchmen suffer.

Danny Stewart May 21, 2009 11:44 PM

Well said, Chris.

Chris Britton May 22, 2009 8:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 53648)
Well said, Chris.

Thanks, it's given me a chance to get back into Star Trek and as a result I have started to get DS9 on DVD, probably my least watched series from the TNG era but ranks as one of my favorites.

Also, it's been confirmed that the guy who played Kirk's dad in the film has been cast as Thor in the upcoming film about the Marvel Comics hero.

Ross Hendrie May 27, 2009 4:48 PM

One thing I forgot to say: the skirts were longer. :(

Danny Stewart May 28, 2009 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53707)
One thing I forgot to say: the skirts were longer. :(

You're lucky they kept them. :P

sharps June 4, 2009 1:23 PM

I am not an avid Star Trek follower but after seeing the film, I just thought it was utterly brilliant. The acting was top notch so was the directing. Some of the in jokes I didn't quite get yet but that is because I am not a follower.

Everything just seemed to be so seamless. However the aleternate reality story running throughout it to be honest gave me a bit of a headache. Overall I thought it was just a brilliant film and I think I am a Star Trek convert.

Chris Britton June 5, 2009 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharps (Post 53764)
I am not an avid Star Trek follower but after seeing the film, I just thought it was utterly brilliant. The acting was top notch so was the directing. Some of the in jokes I didn't quite get yet but that is because I am not a follower.

Everything just seemed to be so seamless. However the aleternate reality story running throughout it to be honest gave me a bit of a headache. Overall I thought it was just a brilliant film and I think I am a Star Trek convert.

Watch Deep Space 9 and that's an order :P

Recurring Villain June 6, 2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharps (Post 53764)
gave me a bit of a headache.

You sure you just weren't sitting too close to the screen?

Ross Hendrie June 8, 2009 9:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Britton (Post 53767)
Watch Deep Space 9 and that's an order :P

I'm not really sure getting new fans who liked the film to go back and watch the series is a good idea, in all honesty.

The film actually makes Star Trek seem cool.

Danny Stewart June 8, 2009 3:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53779)
I'm not really sure getting new fans who liked the film to go back and watch the series is a good idea, in all honesty.

The film actually makes Star Trek seem cool.

Dude, what the fuck. Deep Space Nine was amazing. You don't want people going back to, say, Voyager, but DS9 is totally safe.

Chris Britton June 8, 2009 4:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Stewart (Post 53782)
Dude, what the fuck. Deep Space Nine was amazing. You don't want people going back to, say, Voyager, but DS9 is totally safe.

Anything from DS9 and before is completely safe, with the exception of Star Trek V and some episodes from TNG Series 1 and 2.

As for Voyager, it didn't fall as low as Enterprise but it was a sign of things to come. At the very least wait until you have watched everything prior to it. Just don't watch Threshold.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie (Post 53779)
I'm not really sure getting new fans who liked the film to go back and watch the series is a good idea, in all honesty.

The film actually makes Star Trek seem cool.

I don't know you anymore...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2001 - 2020, Danny Stewart