Originally Posted by Jamie Minty
I think people saw how popular CoD4 was and instead of getting it, they thought they'd wait for CoD W@W, thats what some people I know are doing, I still tell them to get CoD4.
|
You should just throw them off a bridge, instead.
Originally Posted by Jamie Minty
And yep sorry got Treyarch and Activision mixed up, didn't they both make the Spiderman games?
|
Yes, they did. That was the pinnacle of Treyarch's achievement. Why Activision would give CoD to a licensed game developer is beyond me.
Originally Posted by Jamie Minty
Have you actually played W@W, theres nothing wrong with the online modes! There great ... but it is exactly the same as CoD4
|
I played it with my friends on co-op and vs over lan a few days ago. They took the online system and perks, and slapped a new, shitty skin over the top. To say 'there's nothing wrong' with a game as justification for playing it doesn't suffice for me. I play good games, not game that there 'is nothing wrong' with.
Why would I shell out money for a game I've already got with a WWII skin?
Originally Posted by Ben Dawson
Hey, I just had this vision...why not have a futuristic CoD?
|
That's popularly believed to be what Infinite Ward is doing, actually.
Originally Posted by Ross Hendrie
I dont think it would work unless it was a very near future. That would be interesting though.
|
CoD4 was very near future...