 |
View Poll Results: How much of DannyStewart.com should move to Eye of Harmony?
|
Move everything (users, forums, and posts).
|
  
|
3 |
42.86% |
Move just the users (start over with forums and posts).
|
  
|
4 |
57.14% |
Start fresh (move nothing).
|
  
|
0 |
0% |

June 15, 2009, 1:41 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Important question about Eye of Harmony
How much of the DannyStewart.com Forums do we want to transfer over to Eye of Harmony?
The way I see it, we have three choices.
Move everything. We can take it all, including user accounts, forums, and all existing posts.
Just move the users. This is what I'm leaning towards. Take at least some of the user accounts, but start fresh with the forums and posts.
Start completely fresh. Take nothing. None of the existing DannyStewart.com users, forums, or posts. Create new forums and let those who are interested register on the new site. Open playing field.
Please vote in the poll and also post to let me know your thoughts on this, as this is a very important issue.
|

June 15, 2009, 6:28 AM
|
 |
It's a social experiment.
|
|
Join Date: June 2006
Location: Internet
Age: 31
Posts: 521
|
|
Option 2 + Archive
I would suggest archiving the entire old site as it stands in some separate, impossible-to-post-in subforum of the new site (for posterity, historical record etc  ), but starting afresh with forums and posts.
|

June 15, 2009, 7:31 AM
|
 |
"My turn."
|
|
Join Date: June 2004
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 2,966
|
|
I'd say move the users and a select few topics, such as the rules and the things form the staff forum at least and I agree with Rat that this place should be archived. EoH is a natural continuation of DS.com and it seems unfair to just shut DS.com down and forget about it.
__________________
Chris Britton
" As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|

June 15, 2009, 8:06 AM
|
 |
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
Originally Posted by Rat Souffle
I would suggest archiving the entire old site as it stands in some separate, impossible-to-post-in subforum of the new site (for posterity, historical record etc  ), but starting afresh with forums and posts.
|
Agreed.
|

June 16, 2009, 2:09 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
I'm inclined to agree with what's been said here. Some users should be kept (not all of them), but none of the posts should be moved over. I'd prefer to simply archive DannyStewart.com as it stands right now, leave it open for members to browse but not make any new posts. Then just start completely fresh on EoH.
The remaining question is, how should the users be moved over? All of them, some of them, none of them? Should we forget about seniority and just let those who are interested register anew on the new forum? I'm almost thinking that's what we should do, and not move anything over from DannyStewart.com at all.
|

June 16, 2009, 4:51 AM
|
 |
biggus dickus
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: under the bridge
Age: 34
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Just post my best threads nobody else has said anything worth archiving as far as I'm aware.
__________________

Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|

June 16, 2009, 11:27 AM
|
 |
"My turn."
|
|
Join Date: June 2004
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 2,966
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
some of them
|
This
__________________
Chris Britton
" As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Random Question, Vegans?
|
Kody |
General Chat |
55 |
April 22, 2008 6:43 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:59 PM.
|
 |