|
|
June 9, 2007, 1:08 AM
|
|
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
I'm listening to it right now and I'm liking what I hear! Great job, I especially like it because it doesn't sound as different as I thought it would, it's still Fool's Gold. Kudos to Murray for his tips and you for doing this of course. It sounds awesome, but I'm torn between whether I like this more or the one before it.
It seems to increase in volume in some spots and decrease in others though... maybe I'm not hearing it right, that could just be the other instruments and everything.
(You can probably tell right off the bat that I know close to nothing about music.)
Great job!
Last edited by Superkid11; June 9, 2007 at 1:12 AM
|
June 9, 2007, 1:08 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
You're right -- that's from something called "compression" which is a technique I've noticed Murray is extremely fond of.
Essentially it fills out the music so that the whole piece is essentially at the same volume throughout. The more you turn it up, the more powerful the whole piece feels. It's funny, because all I really did in the new version is increase the compression a lot, and then Murray said "Oh yeah, that's sounding a lot more Gold!" (which made me laugh by the way). I joked with a friend before making any changes that all I would have to do is compress it as much as he compressed the album version and then he would love it.
It seems I was at least partly right!
|
June 10, 2007, 2:24 AM
|
New Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
I am very pleased to announce that a brand new and fully updated version of Fool's Gold is now available. With deepest thanks to Murray Gold for his invaluable insights and personal assistance with making this mix the best it can possibly be. I owe him a great deal, and it's been an honor and a privilege sharing this mix with him and receiving his guidance.
Doctor Who - Fool's Gold v2.7.7f
|
That's excellent Danny...really nice stuff.
Any chance of an opening and closing version?
|
June 10, 2007, 2:33 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Heh, the last time I sat down to recut opening and closing versions of Fool's Gold I did it with version 2.6 because I thought it would be my last version. Because of that, I put a lot of time and effort into making the opening and closing versions as good as possible -- it took me over two hours to redo them! Not looking forward to going through all that again, but I suppose it has to be done at some point.
Once I get the final okay from Murray (and hopefully Dominic Glynn as well), I'll begin work on recutting them again.
|
June 10, 2007, 5:12 AM
|
|
Snizzel ma Wizzel
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Home
Age: 37
Posts: 666
|
|
Is it possible to recut something?
__________________
Jez (aka Turnbolt aka Pulse of Orion)
Latest Tracks: Sparks ||||| Battle Scene 1 (a Final Fantasy remix) (v0.2)
He just kept talking in one long incredibly unbroken sentence moving from topic to topic so that no one had a chance to interrupt him it was really quite hypnotic.
*Officially the most likeable person since the last one*
Last edited by Jez; June 10, 2007 at 5:12 AM
Reason: Added nothing, just felt like pressing "Edit" and "Save"
|
June 10, 2007, 12:29 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Yes. To cut something and then cut it again.
|
June 15, 2007, 1:19 AM
|
|
Brilliant work Danny. I thought so when I first heard it on youtube.
|
June 15, 2007, 5:15 AM
|
|
biggus dickus
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: under the bridge
Age: 34
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Originally Posted by roseNmartha
Brilliant work Danny. I thought so when I first heard it on youtube.
|
Your username makes me think of things that would only get broadcast if they happened in Torchwood.
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
June 15, 2007, 11:09 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by roseNmartha
Brilliant work Danny. I thought so when I first heard it on youtube.
|
Thank you very much!
|
June 20, 2007, 11:20 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
I just heard back from Dom, and I'm glad to say he's happy with it now too.
Originally Posted by Dominic Glynn
Firstly - the new Fools Gold does sound excellent. Many times better than Murray's if I may say so! We have a British word "Bollocks". This can be an insult (as in "your track is bollocks!) but in this case...your track has "bollocks" and that is a good thing!
|
So this may indeed be the final version, if I can actually prompt a response from Murray.
|
June 21, 2007, 12:06 AM
|
|
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
Way to go! Hopefully you will. But along with them remember to take in mind the numerous positive responses you got here too.
|
June 21, 2007, 1:05 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Indeed. I have not forgotten all the little people.
|
June 21, 2007, 2:11 PM
|
|
... Bazinga!
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Co. Durham
Age: 32
Posts: 1,132
|
|
Oooh, your tracks has bollocks, over here that's considered a great compliment.
__________________
.._____
/ .. ● . \\>--◖
=-=--=--=
=--=-=--=
|.|.|.|.|.\\>---◖
|●...●...●\\
|●...●....●\\
|●...●.....●\\
|●...●......●\\
DOC-TOR WHO?!?!
|
June 21, 2007, 2:13 PM
|
|
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
And here I thought it was a horrible swear word.
I guess that's like the expression "The sh*t" down here, then. It can go both ways.
|
June 21, 2007, 3:16 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
It's like saying "your track has balls."
|
June 21, 2007, 3:40 PM
|
|
... Bazinga!
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Co. Durham
Age: 32
Posts: 1,132
|
|
Actually, yeah, "bollocks" and "balls" are both alternate terms for testicles.
__________________
.._____
/ .. ● . \\>--◖
=-=--=--=
=--=-=--=
|.|.|.|.|.\\>---◖
|●...●...●\\
|●...●....●\\
|●...●.....●\\
|●...●......●\\
DOC-TOR WHO?!?!
|
June 21, 2007, 3:43 PM
|
|
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
...
I... didn't know that.
|
June 21, 2007, 3:45 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Now you do.
|
June 21, 2007, 9:41 PM
|
|
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
I just pictured this:
Doctor(to a Cyberman): Your weapons are disabled. Give up.
Cyberman: ... DELETE! (kicks The Doctor in the nuts)
Doctor: AAAAGHHH!!! (hits the ground)
Piccolo: The balls are inert.
(Cue Fool's Gold closing version)
|
June 22, 2007, 12:01 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Clearly, the perfect Doctor Who episode.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:44 AM.
|
|