|
|
|
|
#21
February 24, 2007, 2:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The dictionary would disagree with you, Ronn.
1. true; not merely ostensible, nominal, or apparent: the real reason for an act. 2. existing or occurring as fact; actual rather than imaginary, ideal, or fictitious: a story taken from real life. 3. being an actual thing; having objective existence; not imaginary: The events you will see in the film are real and not just made up. 4. being actually such; not merely so-called: a real victory. 5. genuine; not counterfeit, artificial, or imitation; authentic: a real antique; a real diamond; real silk. 6. unfeigned or sincere: real sympathy; a real friend. 7. Informal. absolute; complete; utter: She's a real brain. 8. Philosophy. a. existent or pertaining to the existent as opposed to the nonexistent. b. actual as opposed to possible or potential. c. independent of experience as opposed to phenomenal or apparent. 9. (of money, income, or the like) measured in purchasing power rather than in nominal value: Inflation has driven income down in real terms, though nominal income appears to be higher. 10. Optics. (of an image) formed by the actual convergence of rays, as the image produced in a camera (opposed to virtual). 11. Mathematics. a. of, pertaining to, or having the value of a real number. b. using real numbers: real analysis; real vector space. –adverb 12. Informal. very or extremely: You did a real nice job painting the house. –noun 13. real number. 14. the real, a. something that actually exists, as a particular quantity. b. reality in general. —Idiom 15. for real, Informal. a. in reality; actually: You mean she dyed her hair green for real? b. real; actual: The company's plans to relocate are for real. c. genuine; sincere: I don't believe his friendly attitude is for real. |
|
#22
February 24, 2007, 2:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It doesn't list the way that Jez and Katja were referring to. And anyway, you live in the US, things are different over here
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#23
February 24, 2007, 4:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
CE, and REAL
I also thought that it was a shame they got rid of Christopher Eccleston to fast and i understood that katja's real meant she thought that he was better than all doctors (maybe not so true)
|
|
#24
February 24, 2007, 4:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#25
February 24, 2007, 8:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a tiny, tiny section of your great country where people only accept 'real' as 'the opposite of fake'? Because the rest of the world doesn't.
__________________
 Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top. |
|
#26
February 25, 2007, 5:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nope, just me.
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#27
February 26, 2007, 9:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob I disagree with you. I've said it once and i'll say it again David Tenant is better than Christopher Eccleston.
|
|
#28
February 26, 2007, 2:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
David Tennant is a lot better than Christopher Eccleston.
|
|
#29
February 26, 2007, 3:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I agree, David Tennant is much better |
|
#30
February 26, 2007, 4:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah, he did...for undisclosed reasons wink wink
__________________
.._____ / .. ● . \\>--◖ =-=--=--= =--=-=--= |.|.|.|.|.\\>---◖ |●...●...●\\ |●...●....●\\ |●...●.....●\\ |●...●......●\\ DOC-TOR WHO?!?! 
|
|
#31
February 26, 2007, 5:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm sure most of the older members know, but I really don't like David Tennant at all. Just looking at him fills me up with anger.
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#32
February 26, 2007, 6:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ronn is a strange person.
|
|
#33
February 27, 2007, 3:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well just look at him. All smiley like that grinning dizzy looking Doctor Tom Baker, and having the 'vunerability' of Davison, and the 'wisdom' of Hartnell, that's what the people say, that he's got a bit of all the old Doctors in him. I'm sorry, but I don't want to see all the old Doctors, I want to see a *new* character, not a medley of all the old ones. There are 100 other reasons I could post but I don't want to. I've said them all at one time or another
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#34
February 27, 2007, 3:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top. |
|
#35
February 27, 2007, 3:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
...Does that make any sense?
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#36
February 27, 2007, 11:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#37
February 27, 2007, 1:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, it worked with the first few Doctors didn't it? They were all different weren't they?...
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#38
February 27, 2007, 5:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#39
February 27, 2007, 5:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, I know it's the same person, but personality wise, they contrasted. The 1st and 2nd Doctors were completely different in personality weren't they? As were the rest of the early doctors.
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?! |
|
#40
February 27, 2007, 7:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.
