|
|
|
|
#1
January 26, 2008, 7:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scientology is under attack.
I may be forgiven for mentioning this organization on the forum. However i stumbled across a piece of news the other day which I felt was too important to ignore.
http://apcmag.com/7905/anonymous_thr...y_via_internet It appears that a hacker group, which have been around since the early days of the Internet have decided to attack Scientology in a full frontal Denial of Service attack. Why they have waited until now to do this is beyond me. But they claim that they will not stop until the Church is dismantled. Updates have been scarce, but if this is true then the church is in for a hell of a fight.
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart 
|
|
#2
January 26, 2008, 8:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
They're clearly serious, but then again, it could be kids, a lot of people can do DOS attacks, can't they?
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
|
|
#3
January 26, 2008, 8:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
DoS attacks online are a very simple thing if you have a lot of time and patience. That is if you are working alone, but I don't recommend doing them.
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
|
#4
January 26, 2008, 7:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Also, Scientology is great. The only reason anyone picks on them is because they're the knew religion on the block, but who knows, maybe 2000 years from now America will be "One Nation Under L Ron Hubbard". I also find it doubly hilarious when followers of the Abrahamic religions bash Scientology despite the fact that Scientology's origin story is several orders of magnitude more feasible than anything those delusional spastics could cook up. Scientology ftw.
__________________
 Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
|
#5
January 26, 2008, 7:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
|
#6
January 26, 2008, 8:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
|
#7
January 27, 2008, 1:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Isn't Tom Cruise and his wife both scientologists. It was n the news or summit!
|
|
#8
January 27, 2008, 1:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes they are, it's one of the most controversial relationships around according to the media. not that i pay much attention to either.
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
|
#9
January 27, 2008, 2:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What is it that Scientologists believe?
|
|
#10
January 27, 2008, 2:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
.._____ / .. ● . \\>--◖ =-=--=--= =--=-=--= |.|.|.|.|.\\>---◖ |●...●...●\\ |●...●....●\\ |●...●.....●\\ |●...●......●\\ DOC-TOR WHO?!?! 
|
|
#11
January 27, 2008, 3:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
They believe in Science? I believe in Science I have it every day of the week except Wednesday and the weekend.
I'll wiki it then! EDIT: wiki-ed. Its a type of religion, belief that evrything, (morals, spiritual means etc) can be proved by science. The religion bit wasn't to obvious!
|
|
#12
January 27, 2008, 8:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
|
#13
January 28, 2008, 1:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry i said summit, i went into txt speak (-ish) mode! And no offence to those who follow scientology but I think it sounds pointless and stupid.
|
|
#14
January 28, 2008, 4:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
|
#15
January 30, 2008, 6:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's just continuing a trend then really. I do say again I respect what people believe. Although RV proves a point which has been true for centuries.
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
|
#16
January 30, 2008, 9:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm agnostic so I don't really care about the outcome, but it'll be interesting to watch.
|
|
#17
January 30, 2008, 11:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#18
January 30, 2008, 3:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
|
#19
January 30, 2008, 4:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Chris Britton " As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|
|
#20
January 30, 2008, 4:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:56 AM.
