 |
|

January 26, 2008, 6:04 PM
|
 |
Why?? So?? Serious??
|
|
Join Date: October 2007
Location: England
Age: 32
Posts: 370
|
|
Danny, whats the best Classic:
My friend likes:
5 docs (Me 2)
Genesis Of The Daleks (Loved first part)
Ghost Light (intrigued)
2 Docs (I've heard mixed opinions)
|

January 26, 2008, 6:06 PM
|
 |
Look who's back!
|
|
Join Date: December 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,173
|
|
Ewww, Ghost Light. Icky.
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
|

January 26, 2008, 6:30 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
I have plenty of appreciation for the old series. I just think that video was very bad and ignored the fact that a lot of the "differences" that were pointed out were taking out of context. If I was any good at video making and had the patience I would prove him wrong on action, violence, death and opinions on humans.
|
Bear in mind that the old series has 26 years of "context." The new series has demonstrated what it represents in only three so far.
Originally Posted by NegativeCyberman
Danny, whats the best Classic:
My friend likes:
5 docs (Me 2)
Genesis Of The Daleks (Loved first part)
Ghost Light (intrigued)
2 Docs (I've heard mixed opinions)
|
Some of my favorites are:
Genesis of the Daleks
The Tomb of the Cybermen
The Talons of Weng-Chiang
Pyramids of Mars
Don't formulate your opinions based on what others tell you. Track down some DVDs and watch them for yourself.
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Ewww, Ghost Light. Icky.
|
Your opinion is invalidated right there if you didn't understand Ghost Light. Now that requires some sophistication.
|

January 26, 2008, 6:51 PM
|
 |
Look who's back!
|
|
Join Date: December 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,173
|
|
I 'm not sure I like the way you keep referring to "sophistication," as though there is some sort of class war amongst Doctor Who viewers. Almost arrogant, in fact. Probably sitting there sipping your champagne snorting "Look at me, I'm so high class enjoying old Who more than I do New Who. Pish to these fools of the LCD no appreciating a mere tacky TV show."
When I want sophisticated TV I watch some detective shows, Columbo perhaps. Or maybe Jeeves and Wooster, I own the whole set. Maybe I'll join the LCD and enjoy some 80s and 90s comedy, shoot me.
I understood the storyline, albeit after watching it twice, I just didn't think some of the acting and writing was up to scratch. It was overly bloated, imo. Nothing to do with whether or not I deep fry my tracksuit.
Danny, serious question, do you think that the "unsophisticated" Who viewers of whom you speak all look like this?
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
Last edited by Ronnie Rowlands; January 26, 2008 at 7:11 PM
|

January 26, 2008, 7:39 PM
|
 |
biggus dickus
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: under the bridge
Age: 34
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
|
DEMS MY BOYZ.
__________________

Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|

January 26, 2008, 9:50 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Probably sitting there sipping your champagne snorting "Look at me, I'm so high class enjoying old Who more than I do New Who. Pish to these fools of the LCD no appreciating a mere tacky TV show."
|
Now I'm paranoid that you have some kind of camera or something in my home that you're using to watch me.
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Danny, serious question, do you think that the "unsophisticated" Who viewers of whom you speak all look like this?
|
Looks do not matter -- it's the mindset that matters. However I wouldn't think it unreasonable that the mindsets would be similar between the new Who fanatics and that bunch there.
|

January 27, 2008, 4:48 AM
|
 |
Look who's back!
|
|
Join Date: December 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,173
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
Now I'm paranoid that you have some kind of camera or something in my home that you're using to watch me.
|
I have enough of your antics to blackmail you with.
Looks do not matter -- it's the mindset that matters. However I wouldn't think it unreasonable that the mindsets would be similar between the new Who fanatics and that bunch there.
|
Oh I'm a chav now am I?
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
|

January 27, 2008, 10:32 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
I have enough of your antics to blackmail you with.
|
Oh dear.
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Oh I'm a chav now am I?
|
I never understood the word "chav."
|

January 27, 2008, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Look who's back!
|
|
Join Date: December 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,173
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
Oh dear.
|
Yes. I've plenty of goss on you. Namely sipping champagne and looking down your nose at the riff raff "Who" viewers
I never understood the word "chav."
|
You're not the only one. I used to think it was pronounced "Sharv."
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
|

January 27, 2008, 11:22 AM
|
 |
"My turn."
|
|
Join Date: June 2004
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 2,966
|
|
All chavs should be placed on a island, thrown into a pit, told to fight to the death, then torture the winner.
__________________
Chris Britton
" As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|

January 27, 2008, 11:35 AM
|
 |
Look who's back!
|
|
Join Date: December 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,173
|
|
Yes, there was someone else who had that mindset. His name was Hitler.
__________________
Dost thou expect me, thy monarch, to dine on such meagre portions thus 'ere?!
|

January 27, 2008, 1:32 PM
|
 |
Why?? So?? Serious??
|
|
Join Date: October 2007
Location: England
Age: 32
Posts: 370
|
|
And Hitler was a bad man. But chavs are the most annoying people ever!
|

January 27, 2008, 5:49 PM
|
 |
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
I think Gangsta Rappers would count as Chavs.
|

January 27, 2008, 8:02 PM
|
 |
biggus dickus
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: under the bridge
Age: 34
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
However I wouldn't think it unreasonable that the mindsets would be similar between the new Who fanatics and that bunch there.
|
As evidenced by the average intelligence of them when they appear on this board.
Originally Posted by Chris Britton
All chavs should be placed on a island, thrown into a pit, told to fight to the death, then torture the winner.
|
No, don't torture the winner, deport him to the States, where the "real" gangsters live, as a 'prize'. If they tried what they do in Britain in, say, Los Angeles, he'd get gunned down in 5 minutes.
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Yes, there was someone else who had that mindset. His name was Hitler.
|
GODWINS LAW.
Originally Posted by NegativeCyberman
But chavs are the most annoying people ever!
|
Stupid people in general are the most annoying people ever.
__________________

Not at all benevolent dictator and I don't need to sign my posts cause my name is up there at the top.
|

January 28, 2008, 2:58 PM
|
 |
"My turn."
|
|
Join Date: June 2004
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 2,966
|
|
Originally Posted by Recurring Villain
No, don't torture the winner, deport him to the States, where the "real" gangsters live, as a 'prize'. If they tried what they do in Britain in, say, Los Angeles, he'd get gunned down in 5 minutes.
|
Quoted for truth.
__________________
Chris Britton
" As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|

January 30, 2008, 3:54 AM
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: January 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 78
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Oh I'm a chav now am I?
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
I never understood the word "chav."
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chav
http://doctorwho.time-and-space.co.u...lbum=2&pos=282
(From a fantastic screencap site)
__________________
I really must get around to reading my own scripts, one of these days... - Russell T. Davies, Doctor Who Magazine, June 2009
"Avon Calling."  "Nice Try."
Originally Posted by Ronnie Rowlands
Altered by Recurring Villain
Good, but replace the third line with something like "but I'm on hand to save the day" so that blah de blah wibble dobble lexicon gibberish.
|
|

January 30, 2008, 7:06 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by BritCanuck
|
I have been directed to that article before. I still don't get it.
|

January 30, 2008, 8:53 AM
|
 |
"My turn."
|
|
Join Date: June 2004
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 2,966
|
|
Danny, I would not recommend you try to get it, the day we understand Chavs is the day hell freezes over and Satan decides to throw a world party.
__________________
Chris Britton
" As in, "RTD: Blargh" rather than "Blargh: RTD." Unless of course you're quoting Blargh about RTD." - Danny Stewart
|

January 30, 2008, 9:32 AM
|
 |
Bang.
|
|
Join Date: August 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 895
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny Stewart
I have been directed to that article before. I still don't get it. 
|
Chavs are a lot like Gangsta Rappers, so I've gathered.
|

January 30, 2008, 11:38 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 5,252
|
|
Originally Posted by Superkid11
Chavs are a lot like Gangsta Rappers, so I've gathered.
|
Then I do not wish to associate with either of them.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:26 AM.
|
 |